Re: [CSG111] Re: CSG111 MP5: Exercise 3 Clarification


Subject: Re: [CSG111] Re: CSG111 MP5: Exercise 3 Clarification
From: Therapon Skotiniotis (skotthe@ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Mon Mar 06 2006 - 13:33:59 EST


On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:35:35PM -0500, Wendy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As an FYI my partner and I discovered that block-statement does not work.
> Also, is there really any need to define a new datatype, when expval->bool
> exists, and provides the correct functionality?

 No, you can use expval->bool as long as the behavior of
 your interpreter does not change.

 -- Theo

_______________________________________________
csg111 mailing list
csg111@lists.ccs.neu.edu
https://lists.ccs.neu.edu/bin/listinfo/csg111



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Mar 15 2007 - 15:00:09 EDT