Phillips 203.
Overview
Information networks such as the World Wide Web are
characterized by the interplay between heterogeneous content
and a complex underlying link structure.
This course covers recent research on algorithms for analyzing
such networks, and models that capture their basic properties.
Topics include methods for link analysis,
centralized and decentralized search algorithms,
probabilistic models for networks, and connections with work
in the areas of social networks and citation analysis.
The course pre-requisites include background in algorithms
and graphs at the level of CS 482, as well as some
familiarity with probability and linear algebra.
The work for the course will consist of a mixture
of reaction papers and a few problem sets, concluding with a project.
The coursework is discussed in more detail here.
Course Outline
(1) Overview and Background.
Several things laid the groundwork for the material in this course,
but two stand out in particular:
the increasing availability of network data across
technological, social, and biological domains;
and the rise of the Web as a central object of study in computer science.
We begin by surveying this background material, with a
particular emphasis on the World Wide Web.
-
V. Bush.
As We May Think.
Atlantic Monthly, July 1945.
-
World Wide Web Consortium.
A Little History of the World Wide Web, 1945-1995.
-
A. Broder, R. Kumar, F. Maghoul, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan,
R. Stata, A. Tomkins, J. Wiener.
Graph structure in the web.
9th International World Wide Web Conference, May 2000.
(2) What Can Link Structure Tell Us About Content?
Link structure can be a powerful source of information about
the underlying content in the network.
In the context of the Web, we can try to identify high-quality
information resources from the way in which other pages link to them;
this idea has reflections in the analysis of citation data
to find influential journals, and in the analysis of social networks
to find important members of a community.
- The Hub/Authority and PageRank algorithms
- Some Methodological Issues in Web Link Analysis Algorithms
-
Krishna Bharat, Andrei Broder, Monika Henzinger, Puneet Kumar,
and Suresh Venkatasubramanian.
The Connectivity Server: fast access to linkage information on the Web.
Proc. 7th International World Wide Web Conference, 1998.
-
Brian Amento, Loren Terveen, and Will Hill.
Does "Authority" Mean Quality?
Predicting Expert Quality Ratings of Web Documents.
23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development
in Information Retrieval, 2000.
-
B. D. Davison.
Recognizing Nepotistic Links on the Web.
AAAI Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Web Search, 2000.
-
Arvind Arasu, Jasmine Novak, Andrew Tomkins, John Tomlin
PageRank Computation and the Structure of the Web:
Experiments and Algorithms.
11th International World Wide Web Conference, 2002.
- Connections with Social Networks and Citation Analysis.
-
G. Pinski, F. Narin.
Citation influence for journal aggregates of scientific
publications: Theory, with application
to the literature of physics.
Information Processing and Management, 12(1976), pp. 297--312.
-
L. Katz.
A new status index derived from sociometric analysis.
Psychometrika 18(1953).
-
C.H. Hubbell.
An input-output approach to clique identification.
Sociometry 28(1965).
-
P. Bonacich.
Power and Centrality: A family of measures.
American Journal of Sociology 92(1987).
- Probabilistic Models for Link Analysis
- Relationships between Text and Hyperlinks
- Incorporating Textual Content into Link Analysis
-
Krishna Bharat and Monika R. Henzinger.
Improved algorithms for topic distillation in a hyperlinked environment.
21st International Conference on Research and Development in
Information Retrieval (SIGIR 1998).
-
S. Chakrabarti, B. Dom, D. Gibson, J. Kleinberg, S.R. Kumar,
P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, A. Tomkins.
Mining the link structure of the World Wide Web.
IEEE Computer, August 1999.
-
D. Cohn, T. Hofmann,
The Missing Link -- A Probabilistic Model of Document Content
and Hypertext Connectivity.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 13, 2000.
-
Soumen Chakrabarti, Mukul M. Joshi and Vivek B. Tawde.
Enhanced topic distillation using text, markup tags, and hyperlinks.
24th Annual International Conference on Research and Development
in Information Retrieval, 2001.
-
Davood Rafiei, Alberto Mendelzon.
What is this Page Known for? Computing Web Page Reputations.
Proc. WWW9 Conference, Amsterdam, May 2000
-
Pedro Domingos, Matt Richardson.
The Intelligent Surfer: Probabilistic Combination of
Link and Content Information in PageRank.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, 2002.
-
Taher H. Haveliwala.
Topic-Sensitive PageRank.
11th International World Wide Web Conference, 2002.
- Further Applications of Link Analysis
(3) Inferring Communities from Link Topology
We began the discussion of link analysis with the goal
of searching for and ranking high-quality content.
A lot of the methods to do this, however, uncover richer
structure in the network --- densely connected communties
focused on a particular topic.
The problem of uncovering such community structure differs
in some interesting ways from the heavily studied
problems of clustering and graph partitioning
(though there are clear relationships): rather than
trying to decompose the full network into a few pieces,
the goal is to identify small, densely connected regions
that -- even put together -- may not account for
much of the whole graph.
- Eigenvector Analysis
-
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W.
and Harshman, R. A.
Indexing by latent semantic analysis.
Journal of the Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391-407 (1990).
-
Christos Papadimitriou, Prabhakar Raghavan Hisao Tamaki, Santosh Vempala.
Latent Semantic Indexing: A Probabilistic Analysis.
17th ACM Symposium on the Principles of Database Systems, 1998.
-
D. Gibson, J. Kleinberg, P. Raghavan.
Inferring Web communities from link topology.
Proc. 9th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, 1998.
-
P. Drineas, Ravi Kannan, Alan Frieze, Santosh Vempala and V. Vinay
"Clustering in large graphs and matrices."
Proc. of the 10th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, Baltimore, 1999.
-
Yossi Azar, Amos Fiat, Anna Karlin, Frank McSherry and Jared Saia.
Spectral Analysis of Data.
33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2001.
-
Dimitris Achlioptas, Amos Fiat, Anna Karlin, Frank McSherry,
Web Search via Hub Synthesis.
42nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2001, p.611-618.
-
A. Y. Ng, A. X. Zheng, and M. I. Jordan.
Link analysis, eigenvectors, and stability.
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2001.
-
A. Y. Ng, A. X. Zheng, and M. I. Jordan.
Stable algorithms for link analysis.
24th International Conference on Research and Development in
Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2001).
-
D. Donoho.
High-Dimensional Data Analysis: The Curses and Blessings of Dimensionality.
Notes to accompany lecture at
AMS Conference on Mathematical Challenges of the 21st Century,
August 2000.
- Combinatorial Methods
-
R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, A. Tomkins.
Trawling the web for emerging cyber-communities.
8th International World Wide Web Conference, May 1999.
-
R. Agrawal, R. Srikant.
Fast Algorithms for Mining Association Rules.
20th Int'l Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), 1994.
-
S. Dill, R. Kumar, K. McCurley, S. Rajagopalan, D. Sivakumar, A. Tomkins.
Self-similarity in the Web.
27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, 2001.
-
Gary Flake, Steve Lawrence, C. Lee Giles, Frans Coetzee.
Self-Organization and Identification of Web Communities.
IEEE Computer, 35:3, March 2002.
-
Gary Flake, K. Tsioutsiouliklis, R.E. Tarjan.
Graph Clustering Techniques based on Minimum Cut Trees.
Technical Report 2002-06, NEC, Princeton, NJ, 2002.
-
M. Girvan and M. E. J. Newman.
Community structure in social and biological networks.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8271-8276 (2002).
-
M. Granovetter.
The strength of weak ties.
American Journal of Sociology, 78(6):1360-1380, 1973.
(4) Rank Aggregation and Meta-Search
We have now seen a number of different techniques for
ranking Web pages according to various measures of quality.
Are there principled methods for combining them,
to get an even better `meta-ranking'?
We begin this discussion with a celebrated result of Arrow
from mathematical economics, suggesting some of
the trade-offs inherent in such an approach.
-
K. Arrow.
Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, 1951.
-
H.P. Young.
Condorcet's Theory of Voting.
American Political Science Review 82(1988), pp. 1231-1244.
-
Cynthia Dwork, Ravi Kumar, Moni Naor, D. Sivakumar.
Rank Aggregation Methods for the Web.
10th International World Wide Web Conference, May 2001.
-
Erik Selberg, Oren Etzioni.
The MetaCrawler Architecture for Resource Aggregation on the Web.
IEEE Expert, 1997.
-
Weiyi Meng, Clement Yu, King-Lup Liu.
Building Efficient and Effective Metasearch Engines.
ACM Computing Surveys 34(2002).
-
William W. Cohen, Robert E. Schapire, and Yoram Singer.
Learning to order things.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10: 243--270, 1999.
-
T. Joachims.
Optimizing Search Engines Using Clickthrough Data.
Eighth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,
KDD-2002.
(5) Power-Law Distributions
If we were to generate a random graph on n nodes by including each
possible edge independently with some probability p, then the fraction
of nodes with d neighbors would decrease exponentially in d.
But for many large networks -- including the Web, the Internet,
collaboration networks, and semantic networks --
it quickly became clear that the fraction of nodes with d
neighbors decreases only polynomially in d;
to put it differently, the distribution of degrees obeys a power law.
What processes are capable of generating such power laws,
and why should they be ubiquitous in large networks?
The investigation of these questions suggests that power laws
are just one reflection of the local and global processes driving
the evolution of these networks.
-
A.-L. Barabasi, Reka Albert, and Hawoong Jeong.
Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks.
Physica A 272 173-187 (1999).
-
Bernardo A. Huberman, Lada A. Adamic.
Growth dynamics of the World-Wide Web.
Nature, 399 (1999) 130.
-
Michalis Faloutsos, Petros Faloutsos and Christos Faloutsos.
On Power-Law Relationships of the Internet Topology.
ACM SIGCOMM 1999.
-
R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, D. Sivakumar, A. Tomkins, and E. Upfal.
Stochastic models for the Web graph.
41th IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Computer Science, 2000, pp. 57-65.
-
W. Aiello, F. Chung, L. Lu.
Random evolution of massive graphs.
Handbook of Massive Data Sets, (Eds. James Abello et al.), Kluwer, 2002,
pages 97-122.
-
M. Steyvers, J. B. Tenenbaum.
The large-scale structure of semantic networks:
statistical analyses and a model of semantic growth.
2001.
-
M. Mitzenmacher.
A Brief History of Generative Models for Power Law and
Lognormal Distributions.
Allerton Conference 2001.
-
R. Albert and A.-L.Barabasi.
Statistical mechanics of complex networks.
Reviews of Modern Physics 74, 47 (2002).
-
Qian Chen, Hyunseok Chang. Ramesh Govindan,
Sugih Jamin, Scott J. Shenker, Walter Willinger.
The Origin of Power Laws in Internet Topologies Revisited.
Proc. of IEEE Infocom 2002.
-
J. Carlson and J. Doyle.
Highly Optimized Tolerance: A Mechanism for Power Laws in Designed Systems.
Physical Review E 60:2(1999).
-
A. Fabrikant, E. Koutsoupias, C. Papadimitriou.
Heuristically Optimized Trade-offs: A New Paradigm for
Power Laws in the Internet.
29th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages,
and Programming (ICALP), 2002.
-
M. Molloy and B. Reed.
A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence.
Random Structures and Algorithms 6(1995) 161-180.
-
M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz and D. J. Watts,
Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications.
Phys. Rev. E 64, 026118 (2001).
(6) Decentralized Search and the Small-World Phenomenon
We now shift our focus to problems with a decentralized flavor:
rather than assuming we have access to a central index of the network,
we consider the issue of exploring a network `from the inside',
without global knowledge.
This could be for purposes of search or approximate measurement;
it could also be for the purpose of constructing a complete index,
in order to make centralized algorithms possible.
We begin the discussion of this issue with one of the oldest
results on decentralized search -- Stanley Milgram's `small-world'
experiments from the 1960's, whose participants forwarded
letters through chains of acquaintances to a designated target, and
whose striking outcome established the `six degrees of separation' principle.
What is a general framework for thinking about this type of result,
and what are the general properties that make a network `searchable'?
-
S. Milgram.
The small world problem.
Psychology Today 1(1967).
-
J. Travers and S. Milgram.
An experimental study of the small world problem.
Sociometry 32(1969).
-
P. Killworth and H. Bernard,
Reverse small world experiment.
Social Networks 1(1978).
-
Watts, D. J. and S. H. Strogatz.
Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.
Nature 393:440-42(1998).
-
J. Kleinberg.
The small-world phenomenon: An algorithmic perspective.
Proc. 32nd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2000.
-
J. Kleinberg.
Small-World Phenomena and the Dynamics of Information.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 14, 2001.
-
D. J. Watts, P. S. Dodds, M. E. J. Newman
Identity and Search in Social Networks.
Science, 296, 1302-1305, 2002.
-
F. Menczer.
Growing and Navigating the Small World Web by Local Content.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99(22): 14014-14019, 2002
-
J. Kleinfeld.
Could it be a Big World After All?
The `Six Degrees of Separation' Myth.
Society, April 2002.
(7) Decentralized Search in Peer-to-Peer Networks
Recently, decentralized search has been applied to the
problem of sharing files in a peer-to-peer network without a global index.
Each host in the system holds a subset of the content,
and requests must be routed to the appropriate host
in a decentralized fashion.
As in the case of the small-world problem, the goal is a
network that is easily searchable;
but how should a distributed protocol shape the network
topology so as to attain this goal?
- Unstructured Approaches
-
T. Hong.
Performance.
Peer-to-Peer: Harnessing the Power of Disruptive Technologies.
(A. Oram, editor),
O'Reilly and Associates, 2001.
-
E. Cohen, S. Shenker.
Replication Strategies in Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks.
SIGCOMM 2002.
-
Lada A. Adamic, Rajan M. Lukose, Amit R. Puniyani, Bernardo A. Huberman.
Search in Power-Law Networks.
Phys. Rev. E, 64 46135 (2001).
-
A. Goel, H. Zhang, and R. Govindan.
Using the Small-World Model to Improve Freenet Performance.
IEEE Infocom, 2002.
- Structured Approaches
-
C. Greg Plaxton, Rajmohan Rajaraman, Andrea W. Richa.
Accessing Nearby Copies of Replicated Objects in a Distributed Environment.
ACM Symposium on Parallel Algorithms and Architectures, SPAA 1997.
-
S. Ratnasamy, P. Francis, M. Handley, R. Karp, S. Shenker.
A Scalable Content-Addressable Network.
ACM SIGCOMM, 2001
-
A. Rowstron, P. Druschel.
Pastry: Scalable, distributed object location and routing
for large-scale peer-to-peer systems.
18th IFIP/ACM International Conference on Distributed Systems
Platforms (Middleware 2001).
-
I. Stoica, R. Morris, D. Karger, F. Kaashoek, H. Balakrishnan.
Chord: A Scalable Peer-to-peer Lookup Service for Internet Applications.
ACM SIGCOMM, 2001.
-
B. Y. Zhao, J. D. Kubiatowicz, A. D. Joseph,
Tapestry: An Infrastructure for Fault-Tolerant Wide-Area
Location and Routing.
UC Berkeley Computer Science Division, Report No. UCB/CSD 01/1141, April 2001.
-
Sylvia Ratnasamy, Scott Shenker and Ion Stoica.
Routing Algorithms for DHTs: Some Open Questions.
1st International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS), 2002.
-
Dalia Malkhi, Moni Naor, David Ratajczak.
Viceroy: A Scalable and Dynamic Emulation of the Butterfly.
ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 2002.
(8) Exploring the Web by Crawling, Focused Crawling, and Approximate Sampling
In the Web, crawlers are the bridge between the decentralized
and centralized worlds -- they gather the content so it can be
centrally indexed.
We consider some of the issues in scaling a crawler up to the
scope of the full Web, as well as the problem of
focused crawling, in which one simply wants to
crawl a particular subset of the Web -- for example,
to gather pages only on a particular topic.
Finally, we consider methods based on random sampling
and random walks for determining aggregate properties of the network
and its indices.
- Crawling Methodology
- Focused Crawling
-
Junghoo Cho, Hector Garcia-Molina, Lawrence Page.
Efficient Crawling Through URL Ordering.
7th World Wide Web Conference (WWW7), Brisbane, Australia, April 1998.
-
S. Chakrabarti, M. van den Berg, and B. Dom.
Focused crawling: A new approach to topic-specific Web resource discovery.
8th International World Wide Web Conference, May 1999.
-
M. Diligenti, F.M. Coetzee, S. Lawrence, C.L. Giles, M. Gori
Focused Crawling Using Context Graphs.
26th International Conference on Very Large Databases, VLDB 2000.
-
D. Bergmark.
Collection Synthesis.
Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2002.
- Approximate Sampling
-
K. Bharat and A. Broder.
A technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of
public Web search engines.
Proc. 7th International World Wide Web Conference, 1998.
-
Steve Lawrence and C. Lee Giles.
Accessibility and Distribution of Information on the Web.
Nature 400(6740): 107-109, July 8, 1999.
-
M. Henzinger, A. Heydon, M. Mitzenmacher, and M. Najork.
Measuring Index Quality using Random Walks on the Web.
8th International World Wide Web Conference, May 1999.
-
M. Henzinger, A. Heydon, M. Mitzenmacher, and M. Najork.
On Near-Uniform URL Sampling .
9th International World Wide Web Conference, May 2000.
-
Ziv Bar-Yossef, Alexander Berg, Steve Chien, Jittat Fakcharoenphol,
and Dror Weitz.
Approximating Aggregate Queries about Web Pages via Random Walks.
26th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), 2000,
pages 535-544.
-
Soumen Chakrabarti, Mukul Joshi, Kunal Punera, and David M. Pennock.
The structure of broad topics on the Web.
11th World Wide Web conference, May 2002.
(9) Link-Based Classification
Link analysis plays a role in a problem that is related
to the ones we have been considering:
the task of classifying Web pages into topic categories.
Automated text analysis can give us an estimate of the topic of each page;
but we also suspect that pages have some tendency to be similar
to neighboring pages in the link structure.
How should we combine these two sources of evidence?
A number of probabilistic frameworks are useful for this task,
including the formalism of Markov random fields,
which -- for quite different applications --
has been extensively studied in computer vision.
-
J. Besag.
Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems.
J. Royal Statistical Society B, 36(1974).
-
Soumen Chakrabarti, Byron E. Dom, and Piotr Indyk.
Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks.
Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Management of Data,
SIGMOD 1998, pages 307-318.
-
O. Veksler.
Efficient Graph-Based Energy Minimization Methods in Computer Vision.
Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1999.
-
J. Kleinberg, E. Tardos.
Approximation Algorithms for Classification Problems
with Pairwise Relationships: Metric Labeling and Markov Random Fields.
Proc. 40th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1999.
-
A. Broder, R. Krauthgamer, and M. Mitzenmacher.
Improved Classification via Connectivity Information.
ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2000.
-
Avrim Blum, Shuchi Chawla.
Learning from Labeled and Unlabeled Data using Graph Mincuts.
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2001.
-
T. Joachims, N. Cristianini, and J. Shawe-Taylor.
Composite Kernels for Hypertext Categorisation.
International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2001.
-
B. Taskar, P. Abbeel and D. Koller.
Discriminative Probabilistic Models for Relational Data.
Eighteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
(UAI 2002).
(10) Diffusion of Information Through Networks
We can think of a network as a large circulatory system,
through which information continuously flows.
This diffusion of information can happen rapidly or slowly;
it can be disastrous -- as in a panic or cascading failure --
or beneficial -- as in the spread of an innovation.
Work in several areas has proposed models for such processes,
and investigated when a network is more or less susceptible
to their spread.
(11) Epidemic Algorithms in Networks
The type of diffusion or cascade process we discussed in the previous part
can also be used as a design principle for network protocols.
This leads to the idea of
epidemic algorithms, also called gossip-based algorithms,
in which information is propagated through a collection
of distributed computing hosts, typically using some
form of randomization.
The result is a means of information dissemination that
is often more simpler and more robust than regimented,
centralized schemes.
-
Alan J. Demers, Daniel H. Greene, Carl Hauser, Wes Irish, John Larson,
Scott Shenker, Howard E. Sturgis, Daniel C. Swinehart, Douglas B. Terry.
Epidemic Algorithms for Replicated Database Maintenance.
Operating Systems Review 22(1): 8-32 (1988)
-
R. van Renesse.
Scalable and secure resource location.
Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000.
-
R. van Renesse, K. Birman, W. Vogels.
Astrolabe: A Robust and Scalable Technology For Distributed System
Monitoring, Management, and Data Mining.
to appear in ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 2003.
-
Mor Harchol-Balter, Tom Leighton, Daniel Lewin.
Resource Discovery in Distributed Networks.
ACM Symposium on Principles
of Distributed Computing (PODC), 1999, pp. 229-238.
-
Shay Kutten, David Peleg
Deterministic Distributed Resource Discovery.
ACM Symposium on Principles
of Distributed Computing (PODC), 2000.
-
R. Karp, C. Schindelhauer, S. Shenker, B. Vocking.
Randomized Rumor Spreading.
41st IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2000.
-
D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, A. Demers.
Spatial gossip and resource location protocols.
Proc. 33rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2001.
Network Datasets
There are a number of interesting network datasets available
on the Web; they form a valuable resource for trying out
algorithms and models across a range of settings.
-
Internet topology: The network structure of the Internet
can be studied at several levels of resolution.
Here is a dataset at the autonomous system (AS) level.
-
Web subgraphs: These were constructed by expanding a 200-page response
set to a search engine query, as in the hub/authority algorithm.
This data was collected some time back, so a number of the links
will be broken.
-
Collaboration networks: Datasets of collaboration
among scientists, movie actors, and business people have been
used as proxies for social networks.
Here are two examples.
-
Protein interaction networks:
These are constructed from the collection of proteins in
a cell, with edges joining pairs that have been found to interact.
Naturally, such networks are incomplete, since some
interactions have not yet been discovered.
-
Semantic networks:
Free association datasets for words have
been collected by cognitive scientists;
these are constructed by compiling the free responses
of test subjects when presented with cue words.
(For example, a test subject presented with
the cue word `ice' might react with the word `cold,' `cream,' or `water.')
Other Courses with Overlapping Content
-
Algorithmic Aspects of Computer Networks (Boston Univ.): Byers.
-
Internet Algorithmics (Brown): Goodrich.
-
Algorithms for Indexing and Search (Carnegie Mellon): Blelloch, Lafferty, Miller.
-
Networks and Complexity in Social Systems (Columbia): Watts.
-
Scaling in Networks (Columbia): Lazar.
-
Algorithms at the End of the Wire (Harvard): Mitzenmacher.
-
Hypertext retrieval and mining (IIT Bombay): Chakrabarti.
-
Complex Human Networks Reading Group (MIT): Pentland, Clarkson, Choudhury.
-
Computational Issues in Ecommerce (Penn State): Cox, Giles, Pennock, Zha.
-
Advanced Algorithms in Data Mining (Penn State): Zha.
-
Web Protocols, Principles, and Applications (Polytechnic): Suel.
-
Information Retrieval, Discovery, and Delivery (Princeton): LaPaugh.
-
Data Mining (Stanford): Ullman.
-
Information Retrieval and Distributed Databases (Stanford): Raghavan.
-
Seminar in Data Mining and Search (Tel Aviv): Fiat.
-
Recommender Systems (Virginia Tech): Ramakrishnan.
-
Advanced Topics in Data Mining (UC Irvine): Smyth.
-
Networks and Complexity (UC Irvine): White.
-
Advanced Topics in Information Management Systems (UCLA): Cho.
-
Algorithmic Problems Inspired by the Web (U. Chicago): Simon.
-
Large Scale Networked Systems (U. Chicago): Foster.
-
Advanced algorithms in data mining (U. Helsinki): Mannila.
-
Information Access and Management on the Internet (UIUC): Chang.
-
Graph Mining and Link Analysis Reading Group (U. Maryland): Getoor, Lu.
-
Scaling, Power Laws, and Small World Phenomena in Networks (U. Mass.): Towsley.
-
Peer-to-Peer and Application-Level Networking (U. Mass.): Kurose, Levine, Towsley.
-
Practicum in Data Mining (U. Texas): Ghosh.
-
Machine Learning for Text Analysis (U. Wisconsin): Craven.